1. Thanks. I made changes.

2. An example of your writing: “Competing for attention and building brand reputation for reliable, enjoyable or authoritative writing (though books will be much more than writing in the near future, as Fast Company’s Adam Penenberg pointed out on Wednesday), requires that publishers reject the idea of a finished and closed product that exists between the the covers of a book so that the work can be freed to interact with readers in a networked marketplace.”

A single sentence of 70 words. Whew. Lawyer are you?
“Not very coherent” is not the same as incoherent. You are coherent, but I find that I have to read every sentence twice. Slows me down. Engineers prefer concise sentences. And, we love bullet points.

I’m a better editor of other people’s work. And I am often accused of writing as though I learned grammar in the 19th Century.

On your site, by the way, the sentence “But we help our clients develop goals, strategies, tactics and then we manage the resulting action items” is poorly constructed, with a redundant “we” in the final clause. You could also lose the “and” as “then” is sufficient.